The deficit of health insurance will plunge to 9.4 billion euros this year against 4.4 billion in 2008. In response, the government is considering increasing the hospital plan. It is also for this purpose that the general social contribution (CSG) was founded in 1990. But the creation of new taxes led to the creation of new rights, especially where these samples are more or less disguised (as we are told that the payroll deduction are "no pain"), so that deficits, far from diminishing, are amplified. If govern is to foresee, our country is no longer governed for over 30 years. The different governments simply to extend a social order imposed after World War II, and whose rules are controlled by the social partners who go unpunished. The French government must now confront a problem that another French government had announced a few years ago solved. In any case, it's not for lack of writing since years it was no use to plug holes in inventing new taxes or increasing existing levies, that is to say, emphasizing precisely the underlying causes that lead to structural deficits.
dint of saying that the health (or education, culture ...) is not a good - and a service - like others, we end up believing. You end up believing that health is a vested right, the health system is free, it requires no arbitration, no investment, no training, no research effort. And install the structural conditions of scarcity : The supply will run dry, if not maintained and renewed, even as it unleashes a request by promising unlimited free reimbursement for all or systematic. Sunlight is free because it falls from the sky, requiring no human intervention [1].
The community discovers the invoice for goods and services that members of this community would get it free. And this bill, nobody wants to see. It would be indecent, antisocial. It's a bit like the game of hot potato, everybody wants to get rid of it as it burns our hands. Nobody wants to see the invoice that all Yet everyone contributes to grow. But the carpet no longer hides the dust today. And it is not clear how the state will come to the aid of social security so that public accounts are not in a better situation than the financial statements, except to reinvent a new gas plant designed to camouflage an additional levy, which will only postpone the problem but not solve it.
Most goods and services we consume, or that we want to eat, needs to be conceived, designed, manufactured and distributed, many steps that need investment, paid work and human activity. Whether public or private, that does not change the fact that it will pay the bill one way or another. Either the household pays directly as a client, or indirectly as a taxpayer or insured. How the bill will be borne by households is not neutral because if the customer is king, the taxpayer rarely has a say. That is why we should not rush too quickly into the process of transforming private goods and services in public goods and services.
[1] Not anymore If drinking water or clean air whose production requires activities (industries) reprocessing.
0 comments:
Post a Comment