Leafeon On Pokemon Indigo Online

Nobody likes the "dictatorship of the market." Yet this is a crucial act of the economy. No one likes old, yet it is a law of life.
The dictatorship of the market is preferable to dictatorship of the producer or even that the consumer (not to mention the dictatorship of the proletariat). For the law of contract is the law of person because everyone participates in its own way. Neutralize the law of the market, thus favoring a side of the market at the expense of the other . But the name of what one side would it be more legitimate than the other?

Indeed, if the producer had any power, then we require its production volumes, quality and price without the consumer having a say. Is power monopoly which is a dominant position, which always leads to an abuse of dominance. Certainly, he would claim a "reasonable" price to guarantee income "reasonable." But what could limit his reason and restrain his ambitions if he does not meet the hurdle of the competition? Thus, if one prefers the law of the producer, it sinks into overproduction.
But the law of the consumer is more preferable. If you listen to the consumer, it would consume the best possible quality at the lowest or no pay at all. Such are the demands of the service user groups. If he had any power, the consumer would like a spoiled child. After all, for some goods that are like no other and whose list is growing constantly, the consumer wants the best service in the world without spending a penny, like what happens in the health, justice or education. But if the consumer pays nothing, producers can be paid so that producers offering nothing. Thus, if one prefers the law of the consumer, it moves to the shortage .

The market is precisely out of this impasse is is quick to fall from the moment we seek to circumvent the laws of the market. And it is those who claim that there is another way to prove it. Because if the market is not perfect (nothing is perfect in this world), he deserves to exist, which is not the least of his qualities.

Funbrain Game Planetary Pinball

Scams and betrayals

The escapades of DSK IMF, tribulations Julien Dray, dangerous relationship between the PS and the UNEF, stuffed ballot boxes and the PS in the past, shoes Roland Dumas the wiretapping François Mitterrand or the billions gone up in smoke on a French bank nationalized by the left. Think aloud as Daniel Cohn-Bendit, scams and betrayal are the tradition of the PS and the title of a book that does not fail to make noise.
You will argue that one can find the same right. I admit readily because power corrupts. But when the shenanigans from the left, these practices are even more inexcusable that the politicians are still left the champions of virtue and good conscience, always ready to give others lessons in morality citizen so they are confident of holding a monopoly on values. It's like those ultra-left students who tear the posters of their opponents in us administering lessons of democratic tolerance. The shenanigans on the right are no more excusable, however.
is to limit these abuses inherent in the conquest of power, the liberal philosophy is particularly committed to the principle of separation of powers. For example, do not get the same hands the power to levy taxes and power to create money. Power corrupts those who abuse and misuse of the monetary power depreciates the currency.

is in this sense that philosophy is a liberal humanism. It is not too illusions about the man: he is capable of the best especially if they live in an environment that drives him to make the most of himself, or he may be capable of anything. And the worst is often born of excess power [1].

Recognizing this, how can we believe politicians of all stripes when they urge us to "moralize capitalism"? It should, above all, moralizing politics. However, these practices, inextricably linked to the internal functioning of political parties, pose a fundamental problem at a time when the principle of cost control in all mouths. For regulators that are otherwise specifically people from these organizations which are likely only survive and succeed at the top who have been more agile than others? The critics of the law of the market in the world economy are also those who are actors in a competition far more dreadful and merciless that obeys no rules except that of "not seen, not taken."

There is one huge difference between the French political system and the American political system. In the U.S., if a politician is caught scam, his career is over and must withdraw from the political scene. This was the case with Nixon after the Watergate scandal or, more recently, Bill Clinton. And truly independent media are aware of these abuses. This selection process does not exist among us so that trust between voters and elected officials no longer exist while the political class is struggling to renew.

[1] In the economic sphere, the power companies' production is limited to the power of choice - the purchasing power of the strong sense of the word - that allows consumers to competition. Of course, producers would like to impose their consumer prices and thus determine their income, which is why nobody likes competition, especially not the producers always on the lookout for captive markets. And we're all producers. Yet, as a consumer, no one likes to see her forced choice or limited. And we are all consumers.

Does Alexis Texas Do Black Men

collective consumption or pitfalls of free economic

The current government, like its predecessors, is on the lookout for any tax back so he struggles to contain public spending. In this area, we fire on all cylinders. If'évasion tax in Switzerland is pointed, savings of French is particularly referred to the proposed surcharge revenue savings. But this is not exhausting pump capital that we will relaunch the economy. Be called capitalist or not, the economy will still need private capital to feed productive investments that underpin any sustainable recovery and healthy. If public funding is necessary, they should not come at the expense of private investment.

There is always a great danger for politicians to advance the economic field. There is indeed a fundamental thing that seems to escape common opinion: more the sphere of free goods is growing, and life is expensive and the economy weakened . It is not easy to admit that free general makes life dear. But this is only apparent paradox: as free does not exist, is that inflation is always hidden or that the samples themselves are camouflaged to be made "painless". They are nevertheless of the samples: this is not because we no longer feel the taste of the poison that is more poison. What are
Indeed, goods and services called "free"? In the end, all these goods and services extremely expensive one wants to pay by others (and others do the same reasoning) as education, health or retirement. This is called collective consumption. But what does the collective consumption?
Imagine that when you consume electricity, it's your neighbor who gets the bill because you hacked his account. What you do not know is that your neighbor has done the same thing without your knowledge. The result is a slippage of expenditure which leads to turn a skid levies to pay the invoice group. It is this process of disempowerment which explains the recurrent budget excesses of Social Security and State.
As the purchasing power of households is eaten up by higher levies of any kind, households are demanding more and more goods and services "free" and the domain of collective consumption is still growing, the same one which is causing inflation levies. other words, we all pull on the rope that strangles us .
households do not perceive more that it is precisely this process that eats away at their purchasing power because their charges are hidden. Indeed, politicians are trying to make withdrawals "painless", precisely what he should never do if you want people to react, if we want to reverse the behavior and stop the process. Thus, the payroll taxes are withheld at source (loads, RDS, CSG), hence the illusion of free goods and social services while the levies fail over indirect taxation (VAT) from which the illusion free goods and services.
You do not see how much the state collects revenue to finance property called "free". You do not see that this proportion was huge is likely to break the springs of wealth creation. Yet despite this growing body of levies, the public never have enough resources if we are to believe its representatives, especially because the state continually expands the scope of its powers by feeding a process of collectivization in particular disturbing.

Initially, public money is primarily from the wealth private and the household agrees to let the community. That is how things were included in the declaration of human rights and liberties. This passage states the rights and duties of the taxpayer as contribute to the common good is precisely to act of citizenship. Today we are witnessing a reversal of terms: private money is the share of wealth that the state agrees not to take us, is what remains when the public contributions have been paid. On behalf of a demagogic design of the "social" and solidarity, and on the bottom of unforgivable ignorance - Or even denial - of the laws of economics, all governments have expanded the sphere of free without saying that free is a concept that costs us all.

How To Eliminate Pleurodiaphragmatic Adhesion?

When lucidity is hiding in the polar

Countless books supposedly serious hail the return of Marx and they abound on the shelves of university bookstores. Long ago that I expect more relevant lighting from these types of books whose authors believe that the degree of intelligence is measured by the ability of denigration. I prefer to rejuvenate in the great authors who have made the splendor increased economic thought. Then, to entertain myself, I like to throw myself into a novel. And I did not find in a thriller clear economic analysis that I can hardly find in the bullies of capitalism, which all blend so their hatred trumps reason.
But advances in science are not they partly owe to science fiction? The science has not progressed through the imagination, fertile ground for innovation?
Anyway, I can not resist the temptation to incorporate fully the words that Tom Clancy is bright in the mouth of one of his characters in the novel:

" We all remember the election campaigns for Congress. The candidate told us: "Vote for me, because for every dollar of taxes collected, one dollar and twenty cents back to the district. "You remember those promises?
But they forgot to tell you a few things. Primo, who has never claimed that you depend on the government, a financial standpoint? It is the opposite: the government does not exist if you do not give your money. Second, the government deficit means that each district receives more federal subsidies it pays in taxes federal, I mean in direct federal taxes. Even those that you can see. So these candidates boasted of spending more money than they had. If your neighbor says he draws on your personal checks, you do not think you'll call the police?
We all know that the government collects more than it gives. But he hides. The federal budget deficit means that whenever you borrow money, it costs you more than it should. And why? Because the government itself borrows so much money that it raises interest rates.
So, ladies and gentlemen, each monthly payment for a house or a car, each payment by credit card is also a tax. And sometimes the government offers a tax benefit on interest on your loans. It's nice of him! You're on the offer that you should not have to pay, and then he tells you that you get more than what you paid!
Someone here is gullible enough to swallow that? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not a politician and I am not here today to support either of your candidates to fill vacancies on the House of the People. I'm just here to ask you to think a bit about all this ... "in Tom Clancy , On Order, Volume 2, page367-368 .

In the same vein, the novel by Michael Crichton called "State of Emergency " features a plot that is an excuse to throw a stone into the debate - but the debate is it still possible? - around global warming. Indeed, for environmentalists, the issue of climate change is no longer an assumption but an assumption! By definition, a postulate can not be discussed. And the view to align elements ... that Crichton introduced in all his dialogues refer to actual scientific papers, referenced and published in academic journals recognized (bibliography in support). But this is only a novel. In the past, one Jean de La Fontaine was to stage the animals to try to convey truths that were not good to say to his contemporaries.

Panty Blogger Templates

The apostles of intolerance

Why right-wing figures insist she trying to gain their legitimacy left to the opening on the left, trying to come to terms with the apostles of intolerance, the Taliban good conscience. This is probably the persistent expression of the syndrome of (bad?) Conscious evil-to-right, cleverly exploited by the left as cynical as it may be judgmental. After
Frederic Mitterrand, the budget minister Woerth was therefore made to the party of humanity to participate in a "debate". Can you discuss with the Communists? The answer was not long, the debate was canceled after half an hour and activists began to sing the Internationale. Meanwhile, the artists singing on stage Day of Huma in the name of tolerance and diversity. Soon, the party of humanity would become like the agricultural show, where all the political elite will have to go because the media have taken up residence. Minus the Communist Party and ad'électeurs more popular it is.

Communists and extreme left in general follow a pattern of thought which prohibits precisely to think, much less debated. Remember the famous "preferred be wrong with Sartre but be right with Aron . They know, however, maintain a illusion of debate because they are virtuosos of speech - the chatter? - As evidenced by the monologues of leftist intellectuals or endless AG blocked on campus which is similar to real masses for distilling the good word and put the index with heretics. The discussion is permitted only if it remains within strict frameworks that are the pillars of communist consciousness, like the commandments of a religion that tolerates no dissent.
They have the right to give lessons of tolerance, openness and democracy, but they do not tolerate contradiction, or freedom of expression. How to pretend to be surprised as all countries that have implemented the program to the letter became communist prisons? Communism advocates the dictatorship of the proletariat . We can not be clearer. Under these conditions, democracy is a concept "bourgeois" that will exceed the occasion of the collapse of capitalism and hoped announced.
On campus, the leftists tear the freshly pasted poster by unions who do not share the same board. However, billboards are open to all unions, without any discrimination. In a democracy, yes. Not in the communist world.

Jeff Hardy New Hairstyle

The hot potato

The deficit of health insurance will plunge to 9.4 billion euros this year against 4.4 billion in 2008. In response, the government is considering increasing the hospital plan. It is also for this purpose that the general social contribution (CSG) was founded in 1990. But the creation of new taxes led to the creation of new rights, especially where these samples are more or less disguised (as we are told that the payroll deduction are "no pain"), so that deficits, far from diminishing, are amplified. If
govern is to foresee, our country is no longer governed for over 30 years. The different governments simply to extend a social order imposed after World War II, and whose rules are controlled by the social partners who go unpunished. The French government must now confront a problem that another French government had announced a few years ago solved. In any case, it's not for lack of writing since years it was no use to plug holes in inventing new taxes or increasing existing levies, that is to say, emphasizing precisely the underlying causes that lead to structural deficits.

dint of saying that the health (or education, culture ...) is not a good - and a service - like others, we end up believing. You end up believing that health is a vested right, the health system is free, it requires no arbitration, no investment, no training, no research effort. And install the structural conditions of scarcity : The supply will run dry, if not maintained and renewed, even as it unleashes a request by promising unlimited free reimbursement for all or systematic. Sunlight is free because it falls from the sky, requiring no human intervention [1].
The community discovers the invoice for goods and services that members of this community would get it free. And this bill, nobody wants to see. It would be indecent, antisocial. It's a bit like the game of hot potato, everybody wants to get rid of it as it burns our hands. Nobody wants to see the invoice that all Yet everyone contributes to grow. But the carpet no longer hides the dust today. And it is not clear how the state will come to the aid of social security so that public accounts are not in a better situation than the financial statements, except to reinvent a new gas plant designed to camouflage an additional levy, which will only postpone the problem but not solve it.

Most goods and services we consume, or that we want to eat, needs to be conceived, designed, manufactured and distributed, many steps that need investment, paid work and human activity. Whether public or private, that does not change the fact that it will pay the bill one way or another. Either the household pays directly as a client, or indirectly as a taxpayer or insured. How the bill will be borne by households is not neutral because if the customer is king, the taxpayer rarely has a say. That is why we should not rush too quickly into the process of transforming private goods and services in public goods and services.

[1] Not anymore If drinking water or clean air whose production requires activities (industries) reprocessing.

Fluorescent Light Disposal

selection to the university: a necessary development developed

The term "selection" is a real word-taboo not only the university but in the world of Education. Its mere mention unleashed passions and polemics. How often, controversies arise about terms whose definition is so vague that they eventually become annoying labels whose function is not to serve but to mobilize and score [1]. If
is that professional masters awarded in our universities are recognized by the professional world, we must not fear the selection, the risk of incurring the reproach - see the crime - to be "elitist".
It is also necessary to define elitism in question here. I am an elitist in the sense that I'm interested in students who want to get out and give themselves the means by investing in their education . For them, I will do my best. The studies are a chance, the studies are right but they are also a duty, especially when the overall cost of these studies is in large part supported by the community. The student is accountable to the community (and not the reverse as some students believe too often wacky). It can honor its debt by passing these studies, thus fulfilling the expectations the community, parents and teachers have put in him.

But I'm not elitist in the sense that I consider this type of student can come from all backgrounds and all walks . It is stupid to be prejudiced in the matter. It can come from good families but be lazy, stupid or profiteer. You can be original and be modest worker, motivated and talented. But we can be as modest backgrounds and still be lazy, stupid or profiteer. Social status does not explain everything and does not excuse all behavior. In good economist, I believe that everyone is responsible for his actions. So do not book the university to a particular environment. In this sense, the democratization of education is an excellent development because it broadens the selection panel. But open the selection panel does not mean delete the selection.

other words, if the selection is a priori wrong, there is nevertheless a selection post. No discrimination based on religion, skin color, physical appearance, color policy can not be legitimate nor effective. Again, talents and skills and can come across arise. That's why Silicon Valley is a melting pot. I can not know in advance who is going to work, which will be a good student.
By cons, there will always be good and bad students, students who have worked and others not, those who have real skills and other skills more limited or nonexistent. Therefore, the choice is necessary but only retrospectively on the basis of a real assessment of skills and motivations.

is the essential condition for the diplomas have meaning and an actual value on the labor market. And this is a service to anyone that distribute to everyone qualifications that would become worthless.


[1] is also the case of the term "liberal." I heard one day that I was "a liberal in the worst sense of the term" while my partner was a "liberal in the best sense." We forget that, when words have multiple meanings, so they have more sense.

What Should I Call My Perfume?

Lane hopeless

The oil price increases or the price of fruit and vegetables reduces the professionals involved demonstrate, block traffic or ransack the shelves of supermarkets ... and cowardly government aid to those who will be be heard by attracting media spotlight. And it is even when there is bad weather, epidemic or other unavoidable climate hazard.
Since the government can not raise money in taking on economic actors, such aid lead to increased tax burden will revolt against that again tomorrow professionals, households or individuals. other words, the French are trying to strangle themselves through the politicians they conduct business and against which they manifest then .
The situation is crazy and grotesque, but that's certainly one of the dangers of democracy when the powers of the state and its legitimate areas of intervention are not strictly supervised.

Imagine strangle someone so much that she can barely breathe. Noting that is about to die (although I still need him), I decided to introduce a pipe in his mouth that sends air (a tax shelter) to help him breathe. Obviously, the situation is absurd: it is enough for me to stop strangling. Yet that is what we do collectively. Multiplying the intravenous tubing and to the point that the so-called remedies and aids are about to complete the patient who, without these interventions, with a much healthier body. The body
economic and social development in France suffers from being tortured by a State choke itself controlled by a government prisoner of corporatist demands from all sides. But the incomparable Frederic Bastiat had foreseen all this in his time denouncing the fatal illusions [1].


[1] See http://bastiat.org/fr/funestes_illusions.html